SINKHOLE FACTS AND INFORMATION:
Presented by:                                                                       
FLORIDA PUBLIC ADJUSTING
“Your Premier Sinkhole Public Adjusters”
NEW CLAIM, DENIAL OR REPAIR FAILURE, WE CAN ALMOST ALWAYS HELP.
31 YEARS OF FULL TIME EXPERIENCE
    Phone: 863-701-9799                    E-Mail:
FPA@FloridaPA.net

TAMPA***SPRING HILL***LAKELAND***BROOKSVILLE

Serving Florida Consumers Statewide
Proud members of the Florida Association of Public Insurance
Adjusters and the Florida Windstorm Conference



Home
What are Sinkholes
Red Flags
Who We Are
6 Ways We Can Help
Florida Sinkhole Laws
How Sinkholes Develop
Why Claims Are Denied
Contact Us



 
 

Florida’s Premier Sinkhole Public Adjusters

“Making the odds even”
 

 
 

GEOTECHNICAL METHODS OF TESTING AND WHY MANY VALID SINKHOLE CLAIMS ARE WRONGLY DENIED:

There are a variety of methods that are commonly utilized in the investigation of possible sinkhole activity. Some of them have significant disadvantages, and in certain locations are completely ineffective. Briefly stated, the more common ones are:

1. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR):

An electromagnetic signal is transmitted into the subsurface and is reflected wherever there is a distinct change of sediment or water content. It produces a cross-sectional image of the subsurface by transmitting pulses of ultra high frequency radio waves into the ground. GPR data can be collected continuously or at station intervals. A major disadvantage of this method is that it can only read down to about 25 feet (at best) and does not work on conductive overburden, such as clay. It is also not recommended unless the surface is relatively smooth. This method is usually used in conjunction with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) by identifying “areas of interest” to be drilled. Still yet, we sometimes see the drilling in areas of “non-interest”, which usually finds “no sinkhole activity.” Another disadvantage is that there are often many inaccessible areas in which it cannot get to, such as close to the house or building because of existing plants or shrubs. That prevents other possible “areas of interest” from being detected.

2. Site Drilling:

There are a variety of drilling techniques available. They include shallow drilling (sometimes referred to as “hand auger”), which removes soil samples from the depths of approximately eight feet. This type of drilling has limited value, as it does not penetrate to a sufficient depth. It is, however, often used in conjunction with other methods, and is basically used to determine the strength of the soil the foundation is resting on. Sinkhole activity usually occurs much deeper than this method allows. Another common form of drilling is the “standard penetration testing (SPT drilling)” and can reach depths of over 100 feet. SPT drilling has drawbacks, one of which is that it is only one-dimensional.
Unfortunately, sometimes an insurance company makes a determination that there is no sinkhole activity by only utilizing the SPT method, which gives only a one-dimensional subterranean view. For example, the sinkhole (cavern) may be underneath a structure, and by drilling on either side of the structure, they will find no evidence of sinkhole activity. The SPT can also miss the raveled soil or cavern by just a short distance. Also, part of its interpretation is based on averaging the “N” value (the number of hammer strikes it takes to move the drill through the ground). An especially thin or heavy layer of the subsurface can easily skew that average.
Two and three-dimensional views of the sub-surface can be obtained by several different methods of testing. One such method is referred to as “cross-bore hole acoustic tomography.” In basic terms, the multi-dimensional image of the sub-surface is obtained by lowering in one hole a transmitter and in another hole a receiver. Sound or radio waves are emitted from the transmitter to the receiver at various depths, usually continuous. By using more than two holes, a three-dimensional sub-surface view is obtained. This method works because various types of soils, rocks, and other material have different densities, which can be interpreted via the sound readings. Computers translate the echoes and draw an image of the sub terrain.

3. Electrical Resistivity (ER); Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI); Multi-Electrode Electrical Resistivity (MER):

These are various types of surface geophysical methods of mapping the subsurface geology by placing multiple electrodes in the ground. They measure the natural resistance of soils and other subsurface material to the flow of electricity. In other words, they measure the bulk resistivity of the subsurface to determine geologic structure and/or physical properties. They yield a two or three-dimensional view of the sub terrain and can provide the equivalent information that would take hundreds of SPT’s to provide.

 


 

THREE DIMENSIONAL
 



TWO DIMENSIONAL

 

 

HOME | WHAT ARE SINKHOLES? | RED FLAGS OF SINKHOLE ACTIVITY | WHO WE ARE | 6 WAYS WE CAN HELP |
FLORIDA SINKHOLE LAWS AND YOUR RIGHTS | HOW DO SINKHOLES DEVELOP?| WHY MANY CLAIMS ARE WRONGLY DENIED |
3 WAYS TO CONTACT US NOW

  © 2010 Florida Public Adjusting. All rights reserved.  Website Design By Lakeland Web